[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16178421#comment-16178421
]
Matthias J. Sax commented on KAFKA-5217:
----------------------------------------
I am not sure if we should ignore **all** exceptions during rebalance. Assume,
get {{TimeoutException}} we might eventually just give up. Two issues with
unstable rebalance are tackled via KAFKA-4593 and KAFKA-5541. I would close
this as duplicate for now as I think the two mentioned JIRAs cover what we
need. \cc [~guozhang] [~damianguy] [~bbejeck] WDYT? Is there any other case we
should consider to make rebalance more resilient?
> Improve Streams internal exception handling
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-5217
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5217
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: streams
> Affects Versions: 0.10.2.1
> Reporter: Matthias J. Sax
> Assignee: Matthias J. Sax
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> Streams does not handle all exceptions gracefully atm, but tend to throw
> exceptions to the user, even if we could handle them internally and recover
> automatically. We want to revisit this exception handling to be more
> resilient.
> For example, for any kind of rebalance exception, we should just log it, and
> rejoin the consumer group.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
