No, if you plan to use shared variables across parallel steps you should
use Java types that are thread safe, if not you will have random/weird
results. I have several pipelines that uses a map to store results in
parallel steps
El sábado, 30 de octubre de 2021 a las 14:18:29 UTC+2, abstrakta escribió:
> Hi, Jenkins friends.I wish that I'm in the right place that post these
> Jenkins usage question.
>
> I find that the Scriped Pipeline parallel works like threads.Unlike the
> Declarative Pipeline parallel,the Scriped Pipeline parallel just use one
> executor.Closure in parallel parameters works like a thread.
> My question is:
>
> 1.Does Jenkins garantee the data thread safety of parallel closure
> internally?
>
> 2.Does I need to care about the thread safety of the commands that
> executes in scriped parallel closure?
>
> 3.Is there any limit of usage in the commands that executes in
> parallel?Can I use nested scripted parallel? Why the documentation of
> Declarative Pipeline parallel in Pipeline Syntax reference says that "Note
> that a stage must have one and only one of steps, stages, parallel, or
> matrix. It is not possible to nest a parallel or matrix block within a
> stage directive if that stage directive is nested within a parallel or
> matrix block itself."
>
> I test some nested Pipeline code that might cause thread race condition
> many times.Jekins always give the right answer that shared data is modified
> correctly.Is this thread safety garanteed in the design of Jenkins parallel
> directive?
>
> Pipeline code like this:
>
> pipeline{
> agent any
> stages
> {
> stage('Parallel BuiLd') {
> steps {
> script {
> def i = 0
> def data = 0
> def builds = [:]
> stash name: 'src', include: 'src/**'
> //generate 1000 parallel block
> for (i = 0; i<1000; i++) {
> // make the Map of Closure
> builds["$i"] = {
> //modify shared data, need thread mutex lock?
> data++
> //unstash or other command, need thread mutex
> lock?
> unstah name: 'src'
> def tests = [:]
> // ... generate tests Map
> // Can I use nested parallel?
> parallel tests
> }
> }
> parallel builds
> println data //It does always print 1000
> }
> }
> }
> }
> }
>
> The variable data is always modified to 1000. So Jenkins garantee the
> thread safety of parallel?
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to jenkinsci-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/0712b8c5-42dc-439f-a017-2a5ca45ad1e9n%40googlegroups.com.
