Hi, 

I am heading down this path.  My plan is build a web app that can accept 
test results in various formats, and can aggregate them by build and 
identify them by type. 

It will track sources and link back to them

It will have the ability to normalize the xml paths, e.g. 
/net/server1/workspace and /net/server2/workspace could both be normalized 
to /net/server/workspace

It will have the ability to augment the paths, e.g. building on the example 
above, it could convert the paths to /net/server/functional/workspace and 
/net/server/coverage/workspace

It will compare builds and identify tests that are flaky and tests that are 
failing continually

It will link to JIRA 

It will link to testlink

It will identify builds that have only been through CI testing from those 
that have also had additional testing done

It will identify builds that have been through QA or have been released 
from internal builds. 

I have a framework that we have been using for years that does track 
builds, but it does not track test results yet. I do plan to opensource 
this, if anyone is interested in helping or has additional ideas, please 
ping me directly jeremy dot mordkoff at riftio dot com 





On Friday, February 14, 2020 at 8:29:52 AM UTC-5, Simon Richter wrote:
>
> Hi, 
>
> I have a matrix job that in each leaf runs the test suite twice, once 
> normally and once with memory checking enabled, each of which generates 
> an XML file that can be parsed with the JUnit parser. 
>
> Now I'd like to present the results in the overview in a useful way: 
>
> 1. separate normal/memcheck runs from the same build 
> 2. merge results from different cells of the matrix 
> 3. if tests fail only in some configurations, try to cluster by label 
>
> Problems: 
>
> 1. I have the JUnit plugin parse both generated XML files, but only the 
> normal test run (<Site><Testing>...</></>)shows up in the result 
> summary, not the memory checker (<Site><DynamicAnalysis>...</></>). 
>
> 2. Test results are only available inside the matrix configurations, no 
> summary is available 
>
> 3. I haven't looked at yet, since I need result merging first. 
>
>    Simon 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/2e3a8430-45df-40f8-acc2-05138ec7b732%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to