If you are chomping at the bit, here are all the binaries: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/47weboatdzus22w/AADNF_aBniOyEeQi9MvM82sMa?dl=0
SHA1 checksums: d9c346ac8db497a35825c7dbbb934842a2bc429a branch-api.hpi 16da429f09fb585fd1d744809ee22c8d612fb62c cloudbees-bitbucket-branch-source.hpi 234fa8eb88dad3241d620bb0116dd12fb9decbba git.hpi a68be01144f3045f81a5cf3c0bc60ad12f39b643 github-branch-source.hpi 92237097815b45260bb8b272caa9be9f92eb5085 mercurial.hpi 04c321420b3752a8d8b3af89cae1bf5934607b1c scm-api.hpi SHA256 checksums: 858ce20992c3f179b850c512979999084b11fe7c4c173cf6d4d2e07bbfebf3e7 branch-api.hpi 8ebff7a3ec43df276d4b51d1e5bcb910bbe8eb4cd47a4be0e35f2f2ca1cd0e03 cloudbees-bitbucket-branch-source.hpi 46cbbf11395df4a085829094d5a36dee7328aeba00d33e34b44aa0dcf9898248 git.hpi 6495a60f1bf0733d807f412434c6c2e24b7bba53fd7ce348ca5319ef38571f20 github-branch-source.hpi 173d12042fe8582efdb52e740f4e939b9daa05f181c6aaff31824337d519a31c mercurial.hpi 9b58e9e6d13ce90a91b73f38142bf0977f244df9c52b948988f9d5bdc3785481 scm-api.hpi -Stephen On 20 June 2017 at 14:29, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK! Here we are... testing time! > > These are the plugins that are being covered: (download links should be > live in an hour or two) > > scm-api 2.2.0-alpha-1 https://updates.jenkins.io/download/plugins/ > scm-api/2.2.0-alpha-1/scm-api.hpi > branch-api 2.0.11-alpha-1 https://updates.jenkins.io/ > download/plugins/branch-api/2.0.11-alpha-1/branch-api.hpi > git 3.4.0-alpha-1 https://updates.jenkins.io/download/plugins/git/3.4.0- > alpha-1/git.hpi > mercurial 2.0-alpha-1 https://updates.jenkins.io/ > download/plugins/mercurial/2.0-alpha-1/mercurial.hpi > github-branch-source 2.2.0-alpha-1 https://updates.jenkins.io/ > download/plugins/github-branch-source/2.2.0-alpha-1/ > github-branch-source.hpi > cloudbees-bitbucket-branch-source 2.2.0-alpha-1 > https://updates.jenkins.io/download/plugins/cloudbees- > bitbucket-branch-source/2.2.0-alpha-1/cloudbees-bitbucket- > branch-source.hpi > > Recommended testing procedure: > > 1. Set up a throw-away Jenkins running a version similar to your > production environment *with the pre-upgrade versions of the plugins you > are using*. > 2. Set up ideally at least one organization folder and one standalone > multibranch project building your source code - to a first order you do not > care if the builds succeed or fail, only that the branches are found. > 3. Trigger a scan / index of your organization folders and standalone > multibranch projects. > 4. Wait for the queue to complete > 5. Run the script in the system script console: https://gist.github.com/ > stephenc/64ef58783b4438a126ad4e3f43062df1 and save the output to > smoke-pre-upgrade.txt > 6. Upgrade the relevant plugins, restart Jenkins. > 7. Run the script in the system script console: https://gist.github.com/ > stephenc/64ef58783b4438a126ad4e3f43062df1 and save the output to > smoke-post-upgrade.txt > 8. Trigger a scan / index of your organization folders and standalone > multibranch projects. > 9. Wait for the queue to complete > 10. Run the script in the system script console: https://gist.github.com/ > stephenc/64ef58783b4438a126ad4e3f43062df1 and save the output to > smoke-post-rescan.txt > > At this point, do a diff between smoke-pre-upgrade.txt and > smoke-post-rescan.txt > > You are looking for three classes of difference: > > a. branch jobs that have been rebuilt for no reason (i.e. the revision is > the same) > b. branch jobs that have disappeared for no good reason (i.e. the branch > is still present in the backing scm) > c. branch jobs that have suddenly appeared for no good reason (i.e. the > branch was there before but not found) [expecting some of these for > BitBucket PRs from forks, but only after configuration updated, saved and > another rescan performed] > > My expectation is that nobody will have these kinds of issues. > > Also try out the new UI to see what you think. > > Please report back your testing results either way. Don't forget to report > back your UI feedback too ;-) > > After doing that test in a throw-away Jenkins, you can *optionally* repeat > the test on a *more* production*-like* (emphasis on being production-like > not production) instance... but this is code that has not yet completed > code review (hence -alpha-1 not -beta-1) so it is at your own risk. There > are additional issues to be aware when using more production-like > environment: > > a. You may have builds that were assuming branches were full clones, now > the refspec is tightly reduced to minimize clone time. If you need a full > clone you will need to add the "Advanced Clone" behaviour. > b. Mercurial repositories on Bitbucket Cloud do not support merge commits > for PR building (yet) > c. Credential domains were not being correctly compared so as a result - > if you are using credential domains to help sort credentials - there may be > cases where the credentials are now searched for in a different domain than > you had them in, so your domains may need reconfiguration to have the > credentials found by the multibranch project / org folder. > d. The pipeline snippitizer is generating $class style for some of the > GitHub and BitBucket specific behaviours, this is because my plan is to > further consolidate the implementations and have a single shared > implementation of each for these plugins, that way they can have a single > @Symbol annotation... if that is too difficult then the @Symbol would need > to be prefixed with gitHub / bitbucket respectively, e.g. gitHubBranches, > bitbucketBranches for the discover branches behaviour. > > > Thanks in advance > > -Stephen > > On 18 June 2017 at 15:53, Michael Kobit <mko...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I may be able to help with this as well. >> >> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017, 17:28 Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I will give it a spin too. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> -Dan >>> >>> On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 11:57:26 AM UTC-7, Kevin Burnett wrote: >>>> >>>> we'd be down to try that, yes. thanks for making these changes in a way >>>> that will benefit the product long-term! >>>> >>>> fingers are crossed that there's already a built-in way to pretend like >>>> pull requests don't exist! you're already building the branches; why also >>>> build the pull requests, eh? :) >>>> >>>> thanks! >>>> kb >>>> >>>> >>>> On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 2:35:54 PM UTC-4, Mark Waite wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to be part of the beta test. >>>>> >>>>> Mark Waite >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 12:19 PM Stephen Connolly < >>>>> stephen.al...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Just a quick status update. >>>>>> >>>>>> In final stages of this work now. Bobby is being a superstar and >>>>>> reviewing my 13k LoC change on the Bitbucket branch source - brings lots >>>>>> of >>>>>> feature parity with GitHub and adds the configuration ability of the pure >>>>>> Git branch source >>>>>> >>>>>> I am finalising the GitHub Branch Source changes... likely to be >>>>>> another big PR >>>>>> >>>>>> Then there's a 5k LoC change in the Git plugin >>>>>> >>>>>> Plan is to try and get all merged next week and cut a beta >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll be looking for people to help test at that stage. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please respond if you think you can help (lots of bugs fixed as a >>>>>> side effect of the refactoring - it makes things more easy to test => I >>>>>> found and fixed bugs) >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Sent from my phone >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CA%2BnPnMxfY >>>>>> rZphgYDXFD3i%2Bo_7eDn7mn2qVrzJz6wFaoVkNmc%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CA%2BnPnMxfYrZphgYDXFD3i%2Bo_7eDn7mn2qVrzJz6wFaoVkNmc%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Jenkins Users" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to jenkinsci-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms >>> gid/jenkinsci-users/5dd15ac2-b8a2-4ebd-bb4a-3bffa4815227% >>> 40googlegroups.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/5dd15ac2-b8a2-4ebd-bb4a-3bffa4815227%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Jenkins Users" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to jenkinsci-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms >> gid/jenkinsci-users/CALELY9GHbX4WuHdDKM8-bU1xR5voh-NsfHeQXNA >> xMjJpXkiwrw%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CALELY9GHbX4WuHdDKM8-bU1xR5voh-NsfHeQXNAxMjJpXkiwrw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CA%2BnPnMxf6qaq%3DbkVM8B0RrEvSn0ek%2BCE%2BPPW-bFKXmXWptgCJw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
