Any chance of getting a build with this fix in? I will happily test it for
you.
On Monday, 12 November 2012 10:26:51 UTC, Nicolas De loof wrote:
>
> there's a permission issue with parallel() I have to fix and may explain
> this issue, not sure yet.
> I don't have any other assumption what could make this fail
>
> 2012/11/12 Reuben Gow <geub...@gmail.com <javascript:>>
>
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> Have you had chance to look at this issue?
>>
>>
>> On Friday, 21 September 2012 09:58:06 UTC+1, Nicolas De loof wrote:
>>
>>> This is not expected. First unstable/failed build in a sequence is
>>> supposed to stop the execution.
>>> what version of the plugin are you using ? I committed an attempt to
>>> sanitize thread-safety in 0.5
>>> what OS is master running on ?
>>>
>>> 2012/9/21 Reuben Gow <geub...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am utilising the build flow plugin an have noticed an issue (that is
>>>> also mentioned in the comments on the wiki but has no response).
>>>>
>>>> My DSL looks like this:
>>>>
>>>> parallel (
>>>>> {build( "software_32bit" )},
>>>>> {build( "software_64bit" )}
>>>>> )
>>>>> parallel (
>>>>> {build( "other_software_that_depends_**on_upstream_32bit" ) },
>>>>> {build( "other_software_that_depends_**on_upstream_32bit" ) }
>>>>> )
>>>>> parallel (
>>>>> {build( "some_test_1" )},
>>>>> {build( "some_test_2" )},
>>>>> {build( "some_test_3" )},
>>>>> {build( "some_test_4" )}
>>>>> )
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My problem is that other_software_that_depends_**on_upstream_32bit or
>>>> other_software_that_**depends_on_upstream_32bit has failed yet the
>>>> tests still get kicked off. I was expecting the job to terminate if one of
>>>> the parallel builds failed.
>>>>
>>>> Is this expected behaviour?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
