Thank you very much for your feedback ! 

I think we're going to explore the idea of ​​creating one or more physical 
hosts creating VMs.
Do you use a particular tool or plugin to create those VMs 'on the fly' or 
do you create them manually ?


thank you again!


Le mercredi 26 septembre 2012 18:25:48 UTC+2, Mandeville, Rob a écrit :
>
>  Having the Jenkins server on a host that doesn’t run builds isn’t just 
> interesting, it’s a good idea.  The only downside that I see is that the 
> slave-master communication (probably dominated by your build logs and 
> artifacts) is slowed down to network speeds rather than the speed of your 
> loopback adapter.  I’m running in this configuration with 170+ slave nodes 
> scattered across over a dozen build hosts (each build takes up a user 
> account, so we need multiple slaves per host).  We basically build 60 
> different SCM branches of the same project.
>
>  
>
> Multiple masters can be useful.  I have one master for my build jobs, 
> another one for housekeeping (I find it better than cron because it’s more 
> visible and doesn’t spam you with email, and it’s also useful for some of 
> your more routine command lines), and some people on a side project set up 
> their own.  Part of the question is organizational: Jenkins is small enough 
> that somebody working on a small project can set their own up, if they’re 
> willing to spend a little of maintenance time.  That can keep you less 
> involved in smaller projects, if this sort of a thing is acceptable to your 
> organization.
>
>  
>
> --Rob
>  
>  
>  
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:* jenkins...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> 
> [mailto:jen...@googlegroups.com] <javascript:> *On Behalf Of *mpapo - 
> Michaël Pailloncy
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 26, 2012 8:58 AM
> *To:* jenkins...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> *Subject:* Feedback of your CI architecture
>
>  
>
> Hi all,
>  
>  
>  
> Currently, we manage near 250 jobs related to several java projects and 
> several teams in our company.
>  
>  
>  
> Our CI architecture characteristics : 
>  
> - a Jenkins master on AIX 5.3 with 8 processors and 10 GB of RAM
>  
> - 3 RHEL slaves with 2 processors and 4 GB of RAM
>  
> - 2 Windows slaves with 1 processors and 2 GB of RAM
>  
>  
>  
> We arrive sometimes has limitations with Jenkins. Especially during 
> releases.
>  
>  
>  
> Due to an increase of job number in our Jenkins in my company,  we want to 
> change our architecture to meet our needs. We are going to manage near 500 
> jobs.
>  
> We want to switch the master on a RHEL OS (our new main target platform) 
> and add an AIX slave for projects that need this platform.
>  
>  
>  
> Here are our thoughts :
>  
> - Do you think it would be interesting to have a master only used to 
> monitor the jobs (0 executor, all builds are delegate to slaves) ? 
>
> This could be interesting to have a more stable and more reliable master.
>  
>  
>
> - On the other hand, do you think it could be interesting to use multiple 
> masters ? One for each team for example ?
>
> This could be nice to have a more specialized master per team but I guess 
> it must increase the maintenance time.
>
>  
>  
>  
>  
> I need feedbacks from the community to choose the best architecture :
>  
> How many jobs do you manage ?
>  
> What are the characteristics of your architecture ? (number of slaves, of 
> master ??)
>  
> Would you prefer to use a slave with large capacity, or more with 
> capacities smaller?
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Thanks in advance from any help and feeback !
>  
>  
>  
> Michaël Pailloncy
>  
>  
>  
>  
>   The information in this message is for the intended recipient(s) only 
> and may be the proprietary and/or confidential property of Litle & Co., 
> LLC, and thus protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended 
> recipient(s), or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
> message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, 
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. 
> If you have received this communication in error, please notify Litle & Co. 
> immediately by replying to this message and then promptly deleting it and 
> your reply permanently from your computer.
>  

Reply via email to