I looked into it and did not found any issue with reports generated by mvn 
findbugs:findbugs command the html report generated looks good, but the xml 
reports findbugsXml.xml still shows exculded class and packages.


-----Original Message-----
From: Ullrich Hafner <ullrich.haf...@gmail.com>
To: jenkinsci-users <jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thu, Sep 29, 2011 6:48 pm
Subject: Re: Findbugs report with excluded packages


The FindBugs Jenkins plug-in does not read the exclude filters specified 
n your pom it just renders the results of the maven plug-in. I.e., this 
ust be a problem in your filter configuration.
Ulli
On 09/29/2011 02:44 PM, Christoph Kutzinski wrote:
 Is it working if you call mvn install findbugs:findbugs manually, i.e. from a 
hell?

 If not, we need to see your exclude and include files.


 -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:22:26 -0400 (EDT)
> Von: jhoomshar...@netscape.net
> An: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com
> Betreff: Findbugs report with excluded packages
> I am using Jenkins findbugs plugin v4.29, now I configured my pom to
> exclude few packages, but when I run my project which contains configuration
> mvn install findbugs:findbugs
>
> I am still seeing that findbugs is generating report for excluded
> packages, I have no idea if this is an issue with findbugs maven plugin or 
indbugs
> Jenkins plugin, my pom with finbugs configuration looks like this
>
> <plugin>
>                    <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
>                    <artifactId>findbugs-maven-plugin</artifactId>
>                    <version>2.3.1</version>
>                    <configuration>
>                        <findbugsXmlOutput>true</findbugsXmlOutput>
>
> <findbugsXmlWithMessages>true</findbugsXmlWithMessages>
>                        <xmlOutput>true</xmlOutput>
>
> <excludeFilterFile>findbugs-exclude.xml</excludeFilterFile>
>
> <includeFilterFile>findbugs-include.xml</includeFilterFile>
>                   </configuration>
>             </plugin>
>
> Any help in this regard will be highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Jhoom
>

Reply via email to