Thank Danny,
I think my main problem here is about how to organize so many jobs for our 
products. 
Take example, we have ten components, and one compilation job and several 
analyze jobs for each component.
So it would be more than 40 jobs for a single products( 
10components*1compliation+ 10component *3analyze). And we have also 10 
branches for this product. It would be 10branches*40(jobs/product)=400jobs..
And also we could not find all analyze reports in a single job/workspace. 
We have to observe them in every specify analyze job.


Brs,
Bill

On Monday, March 19, 2012 4:39:56 AM UTC+8, Danny Staple wrote:
>
> I suspect the answer here may be to run the child jobs in a build step, 
> while the parent job waits, and then gravs the downstream jobs artifacts 
> via url. The cli can be used for synchronous job runs, and with a newer 
> jenkins you may even be able to use the SSH system to do it (saves grabbing 
> a copy of that cli jar).
>
> You can actually combine those synchronous runs with wgets in a shell 
> script using the same facilities sti has mentioned:
>
> (java -jar jenkins-cli.jar $JENKINS_URL build compile_job && wget 
> <artifact name>) &
> (java -jar jenkins-cli.jar $JENKINS_URL build analyze_job && wget 
> <artifact name>) &
> wait
>
> I've generalized, and you'll want to look at the cli commands on your 
> server (read https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Jenkins+CLI) for 
> info on it. I also use a for pid in `jobs` style thing if I've many unix 
> jobs on a shell I want to wait for - again, you'll want to familiarise 
> yourself with the job handling syntax of your shell or build language for 
> such things.
>
> On Friday, 16 March 2012 17:54:27 UTC, sti wrote:
>>
>> I typically try to run as much in one job as possible to minimize the 
>> number of jobs. I use these advanced unix operating systems that allow me 
>> to run several things at once like this:
>>
>> Compile &
>> Analyze &
>> wait
>>
>> If you must split it into multiple jobs, it is possible and even 
>> desirable if it allows you to get faster feedback. The only thing is, you 
>> cannot send the results upstream. If you have to have a single job where 
>> everything is available, both build artifacts and test results, you need to 
>> make a new job downstream that collects them both. 
>>
>> There used to be this option to aggregate test results, which kind of 
>> does what you want but I never got it to work. Maybe that option is not 
>> compatible with multiconfiguration jobs which in use a lot. 
>>
>> -- Sami
>>
>> intelchen <bihang.c...@gmail.com> kirjoitti 16.3.2012 kello 18.03:
>>
>> Hi,
>>      It would take so much time to get results of these static code 
>> analysis tools.
>> For example, it takes 12minutes to get findbugs result of our one 
>> component. And we have more than 20 components in our products.
>> And aslo we would like to use checkstyles,pmd besides findbugs.
>> So I break apart them into two stage jobs. The fist stage is about 
>> compliation. The second stage is about these tools.
>> And these tools could run in parallel.Then we could get the results more 
>> quickly,  and send the reports to developers in short time.
>>    Is it a bad or good practice in Jenkins?
>>
>> Brs,
>> Bill
>>
>> On Friday, March 16, 2012 8:59:13 PM UTC+8, sti wrote:
>>>
>>> The most straightforward way is to run the findbug analysis in the same 
>>> job. Why does it need to be run in its own job?
>>>
>>> Jenkins jobs are not as flexible as subroutines in programming 
>>> languages. If you start using them as such, you will shoot yourself in the 
>>> foot. 
>>>
>>> -- Sami
>>>
>>> intelchen <bihang.c...@gmail.com> kirjoitti 16.3.2012 kello 9.28:
>>>
>>> Sorry for a uncompleted mail.
>>> And I would like to copy the findbug_result.xml back to the workspaces 
>>> of the first job.
>>> I think there would be a way to do that is write some shell scripts and 
>>> copy this result back to the former job.
>>> But is there any other solution or existed plug-ins for this requirement?
>>> May I have your ideas? Thanks!
>>>
>>> On Friday, March 16, 2012 3:23:30 PM UTC+8, intelchen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>        There are two stage jobs for one java project.
>>>> One is to do compilation job and create a runtime jar file 
>>>> after polling codes from SCM.
>>>> Second one is to do findbug analysis job. It copy artifact(runtime jar 
>>>> file) from upstream using Copy Artifact Plugin. And there would be a 
>>>> findbug_result.xml generated after this job.
>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to