|
||||||||||||||
|
This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
||||||||||||||
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Guys,
Attached two screenshots from the exactly same build. One that shows Emmas view to the code coverage metrics and another one showing Jacoco's view.
The emma metrics have been built out of the Jacoco coverage result using an xslt stylesheet.
As you can see (I hope you see it) the view given by emma is much more readable than jacoco's view. I would even say that Jacoco's views is completely unusable.