|
||||||||
This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
- [JIRA] (JENKINS-10558) Jenkins mercurial plugi... mike...@gmail.com (JIRA)
- [JIRA] (JENKINS-10558) Jenkins mercurial ... ekstr...@cs.umn.edu (JIRA)
- [JIRA] (JENKINS-10558) Jenkins mercurial ... mike...@gmail.com (JIRA)
- [JIRA] (JENKINS-10558) Jenkins mercurial ... jgl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Great, thanks. I can clearly see uses both for branches that keep their names forever (for documentation reasons), and for ones that drop their names once finished.
I guess bookmarks could be used for both (just don't delete the names you want to keep?) but named branches are probably better for the former as they also have the active/closed status to aid you in finding relevant branches?
So this would boil down to that support for auto-building both all branches and all bookmarks would be valuable
[now voting for both this ticket and JENKINS-11102]