Same here! Luv Eloquence!
Andy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dennis Long" <dennisl1...@gmail.com>
To: <jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com>
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: [JAWS-Users] Good ole' Eloquence
I have never been impressed by the new better voices. I used them to try
and quickly returned to eloquence.
-----Original Message-----
From: JAWS-Users-List [mailto:jaws-users-list-boun...@jaws-users.com] On
Behalf Of JM Casey
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 9:33 AM
To: jaws-users-list@jaws-users.com
Subject: [JAWS-Users] Good ole' Eloquence
Hey guys.
After some thought, I decided to switch my primary synthesiser back to
Eloquence. I must say, that JAWS is now acting a lot more like the robust
and response screen-reader I would expect on such a relatively fast
machine.
I spent the past year listening to a nice, mannered, human-sounding voice,
but wondering why the devil my computer was being just as slow and clunky
at
times as my XP machine was. Well, now I have the answer. Duh. These
Vocalizer voices are resource-intensive and slow the machine down. Anybody
else noticed this? I guess it's a foregone conclusion, but I just assumed
my
machine would be able to handle it well. I think it'd be ok for reading,
but
for all practical purposes, well, the trade in favour of performance is an
obvious no-brainer.
So, what synths does everyone use here, anyway? What are your thoughts on
all the software synths out there nowadays? Curiosity question.
Also, Eloquence - y'know, it's kind of good to have the old man back.
For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
