Agreed it should have had the tag and we should review whether we still have public classes that miss it.
Le ven. 20 janv. 2017 à 09:13, Trejkaz <trej...@trypticon.org> a écrit : > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:43 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think the reason why there was no deprecation notice is that this code > > was considered as internal code rather than something that we explicitly > > expose to users as an API. > > Hmm... > > > http://lucene.apache.org/core/5_5_3/core/org/apache/lucene/util/SloppyMath.html > > Public class, public methods, no @lucene.internal Javadoc tag... Looks like > public API to me. Probably looked like public API to our other developer > who > added the call, too. Probably should at least slap the tag on the docs if > we're > not supposed to use it. I'm sure we have calls to the other methods, too. > :/ > > TX > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
