Yep.. adding a SortedDocValuesField did work for me! thanks.. On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> The Lucene level javadocs are definitely stale ... I'll fix. > > You should separately add a SortedDocValuesField if you also need to sort > on this field. > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Torsten Krah <krah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > looking at the JavaDoc of StringField it says: > > > > /** A field that is indexed but not tokenized: the entire > > * String value is indexed as a single token. For example > > * this might be used for a 'country' field or an 'id' > > * field, or any field that you intend to use for sorting > > * or access through the field cache. */ > > > > So i intend to use some StringFields for sorting. > > However trying to sort on them fails with: > > > > java.lang.IllegalStateException: unexpected docvalues type NONE for > > field 'NAME_KEYWORD' (expected=SORTED). > > > > Was indexed as StringField and Store.YES. > > > > So is the JavaDoc wrong here or is it correct and StringField should > > set: > > > > TYPE.setDocValuesType(DocValuesType.SORTED); > > > > so it would work? > > > > kind regards > > > > Torsten > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > -- Gimantha Bandara Software Engineer WSO2. Inc : http://wso2.com Mobile : +94714961919
