On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well > 2> seriously consider the utility of indexing a 100+M file. Assuming > it's mostly text, lots and lots and lots of queries will match it, and > it'll score pretty low due to length normalization. And you probably > can't return it to the user. And highlighting it will be a performance > problem. And may blow out memory too. And...
Meanwhile, some of our users have expressed concern that they can't view a 2GB text file which was returned in a Lucene result. They even want to see the term hits and expect that to somehow perform the same as a small file. Totally unreasonable. :) TX --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
