On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Yann-Erwan Perio <ye.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Michael McCandless > <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
Hi again, >> That should not be the case: it should match all terms with that >> prefix regardless of the term's length. Try to boil it down to a >> small test case? > > I guess I've been too shallow with my testing, then :( Well, I'll dig > deeper, and if I find something wrong with Lucene, I'll post a small > test case demonstrating the issue - but so far, the errors were always > on my side. I have written a test which demonstrates that the mistake is indeed on my side. It's probably due to inconsistent rules for indexing/searching content having special characters (namely the "plus" sign). Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your answers. Kind regards. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
