That would be great! On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Benson Margulies <ben...@basistech.com> wrote: > Thanks, I might pitch in. > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Mostly because our tokenizers like StandardTokenizer will tokenize the >> same way regardless of normalization form or whether its normalized at >> all? >> >> But for other tokenizers, such a charfilter should be useful: there is >> a JIRA for it, but it has some unresolved issues >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4072 >> >> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Can anyone shed light as to why this is a token filter and not a char >> > filter? I'm wishing for one of these _upstream_ of a tokenizer, so that >> the >> > tokenizer's lookups in its dictionaries are seeing normalized contents. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
