Thanks for testing/confirmation! On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Tom Burton-West <tburt...@umich.edu> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Thanks for the fix. Checkindex finished within 24 hours, which is not > terrible, given the size of this index (about a terabyte).. > > Tom > > Opening index @ /htsolr/lss-dev/solrs/4.2/3/core/data/index > > Segments file=segments_e numSegments=2 version=4.2.1 format= > userData={commitTimeMSec=1374712392103} > 1 of 2: name=_bch docCount=82946896 > codec=Lucene42 > compound=false > numFiles=12 > size (MB)=752,005.689 > diagnostics = {timestamp=1374657630506, os=Linux, > os.version=2.6.18-348.12.1.el5, mergeFactor=16, source=merge, > lucene.version=4.2.1 1461071 - mark - 2013-03-26 08:23:34, os.arch=amd64, > mergeMaxNumSegments=2, java.version=1.6.0_16, java.vendor=Sun Microsystems > Inc.} > no deletions > test: open reader.........OK > test: fields..............OK [12 fields] > test: field norms.........OK [3 fields] > test: terms, freq, prox...OK [2442919802 terms; 73922320413 terms/docs > pairs; 109976572432 tokens] > test: stored fields.......OK [960417844 total field count; avg 11.579 > fields per doc] > test: term vectors........OK [81452262 total vector count; avg 1 > term/freq vector fields per doc] > test: docvalues...........OK [0 docvalues fields; 0 BINARY; 0 NUMERIC; > 0 SORTED; 0 SORTED_SET] > > 2 of 2: name=_bcg docCount=42021835 > codec=Lucene42 > compound=false > numFiles=12 > size (MB)=371,991.272 > diagnostics = {timestamp=1374612106174, os=Linux, > os.version=2.6.18-348.12.1.el5, mergeFactor=30, source=merge, > lucene.version=4.2.1 1461071 - mark - 2013-03-26 08:23:34, os.arch=amd64, > mergeMaxNumSegments=2, java.version=1.6.0_16, java.vendor=Sun Microsystems > Inc.} > no deletions > test: open reader.........OK > test: fields..............OK [12 fields] > test: field norms.........OK [3 fields] > test: terms, freq, prox...OK [1435132736 terms; 36134595066 terms/docs > pairs; 53691487260 tokens] > test: stored fields.......OK [483146935 total field count; avg 11.498 > fields per doc] > test: term vectors........OK [41299979 total vector count; avg 1 > term/freq vector fields per doc] > test: docvalues...........OK [0 docvalues fields; 0 BINARY; 0 NUMERIC; > 0 SORTED; 0 SORTED_SET] > > No problems were detected with this index. > > > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Tom Burton-West <tburt...@umich.edu> >> wrote: >> > Sure I should be able to build a lucene core and give it a try. I >> probably >> > won't run it until tomorrow night though because right now I'm running >> some >> > other tests on the machine I would run CheckIndex from and disk I/O (i.e. >> > CheckIndex) would mess with the tests. >> > >> > Do I just need to check out revision 1511014 from branch 4x and build >> it? >> > >> > >> >> yes, something like: >> >> svn co -r 1511014 >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x >> cd branch_4x/lucene >> ant >> >> this will create a lucene-core-4.5-SNAPSHOT.jar in build/core >> >> Thanks! >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org