Thanks for testing/confirmation!
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Tom Burton-West <tburt...@umich.edu> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Thanks for the fix. Checkindex finished within 24 hours, which is not
> terrible, given the size of this index (about a terabyte)..
>
> Tom
>
> Opening index @ /htsolr/lss-dev/solrs/4.2/3/core/data/index
>
> Segments file=segments_e numSegments=2 version=4.2.1 format=
> userData={commitTimeMSec=1374712392103}
> 1 of 2: name=_bch docCount=82946896
> codec=Lucene42
> compound=false
> numFiles=12
> size (MB)=752,005.689
> diagnostics = {timestamp=1374657630506, os=Linux,
> os.version=2.6.18-348.12.1.el5, mergeFactor=16, source=merge,
> lucene.version=4.2.1 1461071 - mark - 2013-03-26 08:23:34, os.arch=amd64,
> mergeMaxNumSegments=2, java.version=1.6.0_16, java.vendor=Sun Microsystems
> Inc.}
> no deletions
> test: open reader.........OK
> test: fields..............OK [12 fields]
> test: field norms.........OK [3 fields]
> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [2442919802 terms; 73922320413 terms/docs
> pairs; 109976572432 tokens]
> test: stored fields.......OK [960417844 total field count; avg 11.579
> fields per doc]
> test: term vectors........OK [81452262 total vector count; avg 1
> term/freq vector fields per doc]
> test: docvalues...........OK [0 docvalues fields; 0 BINARY; 0 NUMERIC;
> 0 SORTED; 0 SORTED_SET]
>
> 2 of 2: name=_bcg docCount=42021835
> codec=Lucene42
> compound=false
> numFiles=12
> size (MB)=371,991.272
> diagnostics = {timestamp=1374612106174, os=Linux,
> os.version=2.6.18-348.12.1.el5, mergeFactor=30, source=merge,
> lucene.version=4.2.1 1461071 - mark - 2013-03-26 08:23:34, os.arch=amd64,
> mergeMaxNumSegments=2, java.version=1.6.0_16, java.vendor=Sun Microsystems
> Inc.}
> no deletions
> test: open reader.........OK
> test: fields..............OK [12 fields]
> test: field norms.........OK [3 fields]
> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [1435132736 terms; 36134595066 terms/docs
> pairs; 53691487260 tokens]
> test: stored fields.......OK [483146935 total field count; avg 11.498
> fields per doc]
> test: term vectors........OK [41299979 total vector count; avg 1
> term/freq vector fields per doc]
> test: docvalues...........OK [0 docvalues fields; 0 BINARY; 0 NUMERIC;
> 0 SORTED; 0 SORTED_SET]
>
> No problems were detected with this index.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Tom Burton-West <tburt...@umich.edu>
>> wrote:
>> > Sure I should be able to build a lucene core and give it a try. I
>> probably
>> > won't run it until tomorrow night though because right now I'm running
>> some
>> > other tests on the machine I would run CheckIndex from and disk I/O (i.e.
>> > CheckIndex) would mess with the tests.
>> >
>> > Do I just need to check out revision 1511014 from branch 4x and build
>> it?
>> >
>> >
>>
>> yes, something like:
>>
>> svn co -r 1511014
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x
>> cd branch_4x/lucene
>> ant
>>
>> this will create a lucene-core-4.5-SNAPSHOT.jar in build/core
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
