No I do not need scoring. This is a pure retrieval query - which matches what we used to do with Unicorn in Facebook - something like:
(name:sriram AND (friend:1 OR friend:2 ...)) This automatically gives us second degree. With Unicorn, we would always get sub-millisecond performance even for n>500. Should I assume that Lucene is that much worse - or is it that this use case has not been optimized? Sriram. On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Sriram Sankar <san...@gmail.com> wrote: > > termA AND (termB1 OR termB2 OR ... OR termBn) > > Maybe this comment is not appropriate for your use-case, but if you > don't actually need scoring from the disjunction on the right of the > query, a TermsFilter will be faster when n gets large. > > -- > Adrien > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
