I did System.println(d.get('date')), and the output is
"stored,binary,omitNorms,indexOptions=DOCS_ONLY<date:[B@4cbfea1d>"Emmm. On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org>wrote: > > : I used solr to query the index, and verified that each document does > have a > : non-blank date field. I suspect that it's because the lucene-3.6 api I > am > : using can not read datefield correctly from documents written in lucene > 1.4 > : format. > > how did you verify that they all have a non-blank value? > > my wild short in the dark guess here... > > 1) you are "verifying" that every doc has a value in the date field by > using something like q=date:[* TO *] and looking at the numfound and it > matches q=*:* > 2) at some point your date field was indexed but not stored, and a large > number of documnts were added during this time. > 3) so now all of your documents have an *indexed* value for the date > field, but many of them have no *stored* value for the date field. > > > -Hoss > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
