Dear sir/madam, I have been working with lucene 3.0.3 and wish to upgrade to lucene 4.3 but i found the performance of 4.3. slower than 3.0.3. I have attached the code used to test and results of test along with this mail. Is there any specific usage pattern to be followed to improve the performance of 4.3
LUCENE 3.0.3 PERFORMANCE NO OF RECORDS NO OF FIELDS INDEX TIME (IN MS) SEARCH TIME 1 (IN MS) SEARCH TIME 2 (IN MS) SEARCH TIME3 (IN MS) NO OF FIELDS SEARCHED SORT FIELDS INDEX SIZE 1000 3 454 54 1 0 1 NO 66.5KB 10000 3 1117 58 1 2 1 NO 687.7KB 100000 3 2565 71 5 2 1 NO 7.3MB 1000 10 560 64 3 3 3 NO 205.2KB 10000 10 1542 62 3 2 3 NO 2.1MB 100000 10 5018 116 8 9 3 NO 22.7MB 1000 10 601 146 2 2 3 YES 205.2KB 10000 10 1491 72 2 2 3 YES 2.1MB 100000 10 4176 109 7 7 3 YES 22.7MB LUCENE 4.3 PERFORMANCE NO OF RECORDS NO OF FIELDS INDEX TIME SEARCH TIME1 (IN MS) SEARCH TIME2 (IN MS) SEARCH TIME3 (IN MS) NO OF FIELDS SORT FIELDS INDEX SIZE 1000 3 648 70 1 0 1 NO 44.2KB 10000 3 1811 73 1 1 1 NO 434.5KB 100000 3 2792 81 2 3 1 NO 4.6MB 1000 10 972 73 1 1 3 NO 130.9KB 10000 10 2181 72 2 1 3 NO 1.3MB 100000 10 5104 79 3 4 3 NO 13.5MB 1000 10 1056 101 1 0 3 YES 130.9KB 10000 10 2080 160 1 0 3 YES 1.3MB 100000 10 5301 262 2 1 3 YES 13.4MB LUCENE 3.0.3 INDEX SEARCHED WITH LUCENE 4.3 NO OF RECORDS NO OF FIELDS INDEX TIME SEARCH TIME1 (IN MS) SEARCH TIME3 (IN MS)SEARCH TIME3 (IN MS)NO OF FIELDS SORT FIELDS INDEX SIZE 1000 3 404 31 1 0 1 NO 66.5KB 10000 3 1115 29 1 1 1 NO 687.7KB 100000 3 2383 35 2 3 1 NO 7.3MB 1000 10 657 28 2 1 3 NO 202.5KB 10000 10 1548 31 3 2 3 NO 2.1MB 100000 10 4335 41 6 5 3 NO 22.7MB 1000 10 579 67 1 1 3 YES 202.5KB 10000 10 1645 162 1 1 3 YES 2.1MB 100000 10 4294 292 4 3 3 YES 22.7MB Thanks and Regards, R.Manoj
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org