The limit also applies for filters. If you have a list of terms ORed together, the fastest way is not to use a BooleanQuery at all, but instead a TermsFilter (which has no limits).
----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -----Original Message----- > From: Carsten Schnober [mailto:schno...@ids-mannheim.de] > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 9:53 AM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Statically store sub-collections for search (faceted search?) > > Am 12.04.2013 20:08, schrieb SUJIT PAL: > > Hi Carsten, > > > > Why not use your idea of the BooleanQuery but wrap it in a Filter instead? > Since you are not doing any scoring (only filtering), the max boolean clauses > limit should not apply to a filter. > > Hi Sujit, > thanks for your suggestion! I wasn't aware that the max clause limit does not > match for a BooleanQuery wrapped in a filter. I suppose the ideal way would > be to use a BooleanFilter but not a QueryWrapperFilter, right? > > However, I am also not sure how to apply a filter in my use case because I > perform a SpanQuery. Although SpanQuery#getSpans() does take a Bits > object as an argument (acceptDocs), I haven't been able to figure out how to > generate this Bits object correctly from a Filter object. > > Best, > Carsten > > -- > Institut für Deutsche Sprache | http://www.ids-mannheim.de > Projekt KorAP | http://korap.ids-mannheim.de > Tel. +49-(0)621-43740789 | schno...@ids-mannheim.de > Korpusanalyseplattform der nächsten Generation Next Generation Corpus > Analysis Platform > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
