phew! thanks for clarifying simon
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Paul Taylor <paul_t...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > On 19/02/2013 20:56, Paul Taylor wrote: >> >> >> Strange test failure after converting code from Lucene 3.6 to Lucene 4.1 >> >> public void testIndexPuid() throws Exception { >> >> addReleaseOne(); >> RAMDirectory ramDir = new RAMDirectory(); >> createIndex(ramDir); >> >> IndexReader ir = IndexReader.open(ramDir); >> Fields fields = MultiFields.getFields(ir); >> Terms terms = fields.terms("puid"); >> TermsEnum termsEnum = terms.iterator(null); >> termsEnum.next(); >> assertEquals("efd2ace2-b3b9-305f-8a53-9803595c0e38", >> termsEnum.term()); >> } >> >> returns: >> >> Expected :efd2ace2-b3b9-305f-8a53-9803595c0e38 >> Actual :[65 66 64 32 61 63 65 32 2d 62 33 62 39 2d 33 30 35 66 2d 38 61 >> 35 33 2d 39 38 30 33 35 39 35 63 30 65 33 38] >> >> It seems to be adding the field as a binary field rather than a text >> field, but I checked and the field is being added using the deprecated >> >> new Field("puid", value, Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS, new >> KeywordAnalyzer()) >> >> so shouldn't that work the same way as before ? >> >> >> > Doh, my bad missing utf8ToString() > > > assertEquals("efd2ace2-b3b9-305f-8a53-9803595c0e38", > termsEnum.term().utf8ToString()); > > Paul > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org