phew! thanks for clarifying
simon
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Paul Taylor <paul_t...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> On 19/02/2013 20:56, Paul Taylor wrote:
>>
>>
>> Strange test failure after converting code from Lucene 3.6 to Lucene 4.1
>>
>> public void testIndexPuid() throws Exception {
>>
>> addReleaseOne();
>> RAMDirectory ramDir = new RAMDirectory();
>> createIndex(ramDir);
>>
>> IndexReader ir = IndexReader.open(ramDir);
>> Fields fields = MultiFields.getFields(ir);
>> Terms terms = fields.terms("puid");
>> TermsEnum termsEnum = terms.iterator(null);
>> termsEnum.next();
>> assertEquals("efd2ace2-b3b9-305f-8a53-9803595c0e38",
>> termsEnum.term());
>> }
>>
>> returns:
>>
>> Expected :efd2ace2-b3b9-305f-8a53-9803595c0e38
>> Actual :[65 66 64 32 61 63 65 32 2d 62 33 62 39 2d 33 30 35 66 2d 38 61
>> 35 33 2d 39 38 30 33 35 39 35 63 30 65 33 38]
>>
>> It seems to be adding the field as a binary field rather than a text
>> field, but I checked and the field is being added using the deprecated
>>
>> new Field("puid", value, Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS, new
>> KeywordAnalyzer())
>>
>> so shouldn't that work the same way as before ?
>>
>>
>>
> Doh, my bad missing utf8ToString()
>
>
> assertEquals("efd2ace2-b3b9-305f-8a53-9803595c0e38",
> termsEnum.term().utf8ToString());
>
> Paul
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
