Hi Mike: I wrote up some tests last night against 3.6 trying to find some way to reproduce what you are seeing, e.g. adding additional segments with the field specified without term vectors, without tv offsets, omitting TF, and merging them and checking everything out. I couldnt find any problems.
Can you provide more information? On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Mike O'Leary <tmole...@uw.edu> wrote: > I created an index using Lucene 3.6.0 in which I specified that a certain > text field in each document should be indexed, stored, analyzed with no > norms, with term vectors, offsets and positions. Later I looked at that index > in Luke, and it said that term vectors were created for this field, but > offsets and positions were not. The code I used for indexing couldn't be > simpler. It looks like this for the relevant field: > > doc.add(new Field("ReportText", reportTextContents, Field.Store.YES, > Field.Index.ANALYZED_NO_NORMS, Field.TermVector.WITH_POSITIONS_OFFSETS); > > The indexer adds these documents to the index and commits them. I ran the > indexer in a debugger and watched the Lucene code set the Field instance > variables called storeTermVector, storeOffsetWithTermVector and > storePositionWithTermVector to true for this field. > > When the indexing was done, I ran a simple program in a debugger that opens > an index, reads each document and writes out its information as XML. The > values of storeOffsetWithTermVector and storePositionWithTermVector in the > ReportText Field objects were false. Is there something other than specifying > Field.TermVector.WITH_POSITIONS_OFFSETS when constructing a Field that needs > to be done in order for offsets and positions to be saved in the index? Or > are there circumstances under which the Field.TermVector setting for a Field > object is ignored? This doesn't make sense to me, and I could swear that > offsets and positions were being saved in some older indexes I created that I > unfortunately no longer have around for comparison. I'm sure that I am just > overlooking something or have made some kind of mistake, but I can't see what > it is at the moment. Thanks for any help or advice you can give me. > Mike -- lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org