So I just looked at the tags added by Paul and quickly tagged a few other related items. You can see them here: http://www.codemaps.org/s/Lucene/t/query-related
Do you think this might be helpful to people trying to learn more about queries? (It seems that the site has a bug. I tagged some of the existing content on the site, but it is right now saying that the content was created today) -Abhishek Disclaimer: I have been working on CodeMaps for a bit - hoping that it will be helpful on my code. On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Paul Hill <p...@metajure.com> wrote: > As text retrieval geeks, we hate manual tagging :-) We want you to analyze > the content (might I suggest using Lucene and Mahout) and categorize it for > us. :-) > But jokes aside, a major category of tags would be "(text) analysis" or > "tokenization" or "term processing for indexing" -- all that stuff related > to Analysis and all the language specific stuff that is needed before > something is put in the index. > > And then there are all the classes that represent the information from the > index, they are used in indexing (putting in) and searching (taking out), > but they really are index related, not specifically indexing or searching. > Oh the problems coming up with a good set of tags... > > Note, I added a handful of tags anyway. > > -Paul > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Seth Rosen [mailto:s...@architexa.com] > > We were wondering if you guys could do us a quick favor. Would you take > 5-minutes, go to the site, and > > tag code as being performance-sensitive, query-related, indexing, > needs-refactoring, or something similar. > > We believe that with people tagging the Lucene codebase - it will become > an awesome community > > resource. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
