Hi, Thanks for your fix. I used it but I think there is something wrong with the fix!!? because I am using LATimes collection and with epsilon = 0.1 and k =10 I got 97% pruned index. It means 3% of index left unchanged after pruning. In the the original paper, "Static index pruning for IR systems", for the same data set with the same parameters, they have 36.4%. Has enyone used this package with LATimes dataset?
Thanks in advance, Best regards ZP -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/pruning-package-pruneAllPositions-tp3954762p3987531.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
