I cannot do that, I need to query for specific fields, both for the whole value in a term (keyword) and for fuzzy/phrase...
For the sorting I will probably take Erick Ericksson's suggestion - use a separate non-analyzed field for sorting. Makes sense. The other problem (querying both by whole keyword in a term and by fuzzy/phrase) ... I guess it would be solvable if I could use a StandardAnalyzer which also generated the whole input as a token, in addition to the tokens it already generates, but I haven't managed to make one. Any suggestion in this regard? Francisco A. Lozano On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 14:12, Vinaya Kumar Thimmappa <vthimma...@ariba.com> wrote: > Why don't you store keywords related data in keywords field which can be > analyzed and other field in as it is now. > So all fields for which keywords is needed, move it to keywords section > > -v > > -----Original Message----- > From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 5:38 PM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Storing same field twice (analyzed+not-analyzed), sorting > > Hmmm, putting analyzed and unanalyzed values in > the same field seems like it'd be difficult to get right. In > the Solr world, two separate fields are usually used. > > > Sorting is right out, the results are unpredictable. What does > it mean to sort on a field with multiple tokens? For a doc > with "aardvark" and "zebra", where should it fall in the > result list? > > If you're sorting, it's best to use a single value per doc. > > Best > Erick > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Francisco A. Lozano <floz...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm storing a field two times, one analyzed and other non-analyzed, in >> order to be able to query for terms and for exact keyword: >> >> // Analyzed version >> d.add(new Field(key, value, Store.NO, Index.ANALYZED, >> TermVector.YES)); >> // Not-analyzed version >> d.add(new Field(key, value, Store.NO, >> Index.NOT_ANALYZED)); >> >> My first question is if this is supposed to cause problems somehow or >> if it's OK. >> >> The problem is that I'm getting strange results when sorting, most of >> the documents seem correctly sorted but some of them appear at the >> end. Am I doing something wrong? >> >> Francisco A. Lozano >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
