On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Sean Tong <st...@jamasoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I modified the DocMaker in 3.5 to make it index the same 4 fields as 2.4.1 > does. Now I got very similar stats in the index by checking Luke. The index > performance was slightly better than that by indexing 7 fields but still not > comparable with the 2.4.1 performance: > > [java] ------------> Report sum by Prefix (MAddDocs) and Round (3 about 3 out > of 14) > [java] Operation round flush mrg runCnt recsPerRun rec/s > elapsedSec avgUsedMem avgTotalMem > [java] MAddDocs_200000 0 16.00 10 1 200000 767.18 > 260.70 113,206,984 144,637,952 > [java] MAddDocs_200000 - 1 16.00 10 - - 1 - - 200000 - - 801.61 > - - 249.50 - 117,778,992 - 144,637,952 > [java] MAddDocs_200000 2 16.00 10 1 200000 734.39 > 272.33 121,479,568 126,287,872 > > Maybe there are some other settings that make the benchmarks not comparable.
I think for benchmarking, this CloseIndex task should default to doWait=false... maybe try passing that parameter to it. -- lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
