It could be the case, but I am not sure what version of icu jar you
had before without looking thru svn logs.

if you are currently using 4.6, you are probably ok, as that was when
the unicode version was bumped to 6.0.
most of the rules etc are driven by the unicode version itself.

I would suggest just using your old icu jar and lucene-icu.jar until
you yourself want to upgrade... its not guaranteed to work but I
suspect it will :)

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Burton-West, Tom <tburt...@umich.edu> wrote:
> We are about to upgrade to Solr/Lucene 3.3 from a 3.1dev version (Lucene 
> Implementation Version: 3.1-SNAPSHOT 1036094 - 2010-11-19 16:01:10)
>
> We have a 6 TB + index that includes somewhere over 200 languages that was 
> indexed with the ICUTokenizer and ICUFoldingFilter from  3.1dev and would 
> like to avoid re-indexing if possible.
>
> LUCENE-3149<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3149>: Upgrade 
> contrib/icu's ICU jar file to ICU 4.8.
> I couldn't tell from looking at the release notes from ICU 4.8 whether the 
> changes affected internal API's or actual rules for tokenizing or folding
>
> Do the changes to the ICU filters/tokenizers in Solr/Lucene 3.3 change how 
> tokenizing and the folding filter work in terms of queries run through the 
> 3.3 filters possibly not matching documents indexed with the 3.1dev filters?
>
> Tom Burton-West
>
>
>



-- 
lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to