Is there only one segments_N file in the index (the one with all 0s)? Or is there a segments_(N-1) too?
Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Tarr, Gregory <gregory.t...@detica.com> wrote: > We don't have a -9 in the file. It isn't a valid lucene segments file, > as it only contains zeros. > > We're wondering why this opens in Luke, and why the CheckIndex reports > that the index is OK. > > -----Original Message----- > From: mark harwood [mailto:markharw...@yahoo.co.uk] > Sent: 28 June 2011 13:09 > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Corrupt segments file full of zeros > > According to the spec there should at least be an Int32 of -9 to > declare the Format - > http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_3/fileformats.html#Segments File > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Tue, 28 June, 2011 12:32:34 > Subject: RE: Corrupt segments file full of zeros > > So where is the problem at all? Why should a segments file not contain > lots > of zeroes? If the index is not corrupt all is fine. > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tarr, Gregory [mailto:gregory.t...@detica.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 11:56 AM >> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: RE: Corrupt segments file full of zeros >> >> Yes I have done that, and you just get "No problems were detected with > this >> index" >> >> Surely there is a major problem with this index? >> >> Also the check() procedure takes a long time - is there any way you > can > just >> do a health check on the segments file? >> >> Thanks >> >> Greg >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com] >> Sent: 28 June 2011 10:36 >> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Corrupt segments file full of zeros >> >> You can try the CheckIndex tool. You feed it a directory and call >> .check() and it reports the results. >> >> Shai >> >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Tarr, Gregory >> <gregory.t...@detica.com>wrote: >> >> > We have a problem with our fileserver where our indexes are hosted >> > remotely, using Lucene 2.9.3. >> > >> > This can mean that a segments file is written which is full of ASCII >> > zeros. Using the od -ah command, we get: >> > >> > 0000000 nul nul nul nul nul nul nul....etc >> > >> > If opened in Luke, the index opens successfully but has zero >> documents. >> > >> > Why does this open correctly in luke, and is there a procedure in > the >> > lucene code that can verify a segments file, e.g. check whether it >> > refers to any segments? >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > Greg >> > >> > >> > Please consider the environment before printing this email. >> > >> > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have > received >> > this email in error please notify the sender and destroy it >> immediately. >> > >> > Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in > hard >> > copy by an authorised signatory. The contents of this email may >> > relate to dealings with other companies under the control of Detica >> > Limited, details of which can be found at >> http://www.detica.com/statutory-information. >> > >> > Detica Limited is registered in England under No: 1337451. >> > Registered offices: Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 > 7YP, >> > England. >> > >> > >> Please consider the environment before printing this email. >> >> This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received > this >> email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately. >> >> Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard > copy >> by an authorised signatory. The contents of this email may relate to > dealings >> with other companies under the control of Detica Limited, details of > which >> can be found at http://www.detica.com/statutory-information. >> >> Detica Limited is registered in England under No: 1337451. >> Registered offices: Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YP, >> England. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > Please consider the environment before printing this email. > > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this > email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately. > > Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy by > an authorised signatory. The contents of this email may relate to dealings > with other companies under the control of Detica Limited, details of which > can be found at http://www.detica.com/statutory-information. > > Detica Limited is registered in England under No: 1337451. > Registered offices: Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YP, England. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
