If i understand the requirement correctly, contract is one document in your
system which in turn contains some *'n*' fields. Contract_ID is the key in
all the documents(Structures). Contract_ID is the only field you want to
retrieve no matter on what field you search for. If this is the case, store
and index Contract_ID for each document and just index the rest of the
fields.
This way the documents returned when you search will only contain
Contract_ID.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Pranav goyal <pranavgoyal40...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Got stuck at a place and not able to think what should I do.
> I have one structure which I have to index. Let say the structure name is
> Contract which has a unique Contract_ID. Let say I have 50 contracts which
> I
> have to index.
>
> Now each contract has let say 100 different keys with their values.
>
> For example
>
> key is ->Contract_ID Value is 0000324123
> key is ->ContractDomain...Value is GOV
> key is ->CtrtSubType...Value is PUB_TENDER[40]
> key is ->DocStatus...Value is Off.DFT[1]
> key is ->GenericBrandType...Value is BRND[2]
> key is ->CustomerContactInfo...Value is 9346831616
>
> like this there are 95 more keys with their values in each contract.
>
> Now I have to index *all the contracts*.
> How should I make my index?
>
> StandardAnalyzer analyzer = new StandardAnalyzer(Version.LUCENE_31);
> IndexWriter writer = null;
> File indexDir = new File("./indexDir");
> try {
> writer = new IndexWriter(FSDirectory.open(indexDir),
> analyzer, IndexWriter.MaxFieldLength.UNLIMITED);
> }
> catch (IOException e1) {
> e1.printStackTrace();
> }
>
> Document d = new Document();
> d.add(new Field("key", key , Field.Store.YES , Field.Index.ANALYZED));
> d.add(new Field("attribute",attribute.toString(), Field.Store.YES,
> Field.Index.NO));
> try {
> writer.addDocument(d);
> writer.optimize() ;
> writer.close();
> }
> catch (IOException e1) {
> e1.printStackTrace();
> }
> }
>
> In the end what I want to get is the Contract_ID whenever I search for
> anything.
> Please help me out. I am in a fix. Whether I am indexing it the right way
> or
> I should do it the other way?
>
--
Thanks and Regards,
DakshinaMurthy BM
