Le 6 mai 2011 à 00:20, Otis Gospodnetic a écrit : >> thus far, only search-testing has provided some analytics measures for us >> (precision and recall ones). We, of course, construct the test-suites from >> the >> logs. > > Interesting. It sounds like you don't currently utilize any sort of > reporting > tool that would tell you more about users' search experience other than what > you > can glean from the logs (number of hits, query string, any other params like > hl, > fq, etc., request handler used, and latency).?
Correct, there was no plan for such operation yet. It can sure be a useful thing. I wonder if there's a lot of literature about such best practice btw. This I would be very interested to hear. > So you can't really tell, for > example, what percentage of queries are getting DYM suggestions or what > percentage of queries originate from DYM suggestion, right? You also can't > tell > which queries result in very low click-through rate? etc. I think that one of the keys here is that we would need external linkable queries, and in the ActiveMath engine I've been working on there was none such unfortunately. > Those are some examples of search analytics reports that I was thinking > people > might be running in order to better understand how their search is behaving > and > what users are experiencing. It sure is desirable but the toolset was not right-away available for this. The simple log counts as François Schiettecatte just responded in the solr list would even be useful but again, it needs a little extra programming. All people I met would recommend Google Analytics for this. I tend to dislike their approach and do not know open-source, "my server side", solutions. Hence I made this thread public to hear about "satelites" (which are somewhat lucene related). paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
