Hello Robert, thank you for the answers! :) Currently I used PatchedFrameOfRef and PatchedFrameOfRef2. Therefore both implementations are PForDelta! Sorry my mistake.
PatchedFrameOfRef2: PforDelta W/O Freq W/O Pos 1.6 GB PatchedFrameOfRef : Pfor W/O Freq W/O Pos 3.1 GB Here are some numbers: PatchedFrameOfRef2 w/o POS w/o FREQ segements.gen 20 Bytes _43.fdt 8,1 MB _43.fdx 64,4 MB _43.fnm 20 Bytes _43_0.skp 182,6 MB _43_0.tib 32,3 MB _43_0.tiv 1,0 MB segements_2 268 Bytes _43_0.doc 1,3 GB PatchedFrameOfRef w/o POS w/o FREQ segements.gen 20 Bytes _43.fdt 8,1 MB _43.fdx 64,4 MB _43.fnm 20 Bytes _43_0.skp 182,6 MB _43_0.tib 32,3 MB _43_0.tiv 1,1 MB segements_2 267 Bytes _43_0.doc 2,8 GB During indexing I use StandardAnalyzer (StandardFilter, LowerCaseFilter, StopFilter). Can I get somewhere more information for Codec creation or is there just "grubbing" through the code? My own implementation needs 2,8 GB of space including FREQ but not POS. This is why I am asking because I want somehow compare the result. Compared to 20 GB it is very nice and compared to 1,6 GB it is very bad ;). Regards Alex -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/New-codecs-keep-Freq-skip-omit-Pos-tp2849776p2851809.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
