Thank you very much for your answers :-) First of all, I just noticed I sent the question unintentionally to the Lucene list while it's more of a Solr issue. I will answer here all the same to not confuse things. My apologies ;)

First to Erick's suggestions. The default field has been "text" for a longer time so I did not make a change to that field yesterday but it had been this field before already. With "not created by Solr" I exactly mean it has been created using Lucene directly. This could be an issue indeed as Lucene 2.3.1 has been used to create the index, where Solr 1.4.1 uses Lucene 2.9.3. But it seemed to work fine so far (but perhaps that's just wrong, I don't know yet).

I tried your hint with appending "&debugQuery=on". Guess what: With that appended I get my hits. No kidding, appending the debug option gives my 30 document hits, deleting it from my browser's address bar leaves me behind with 0 hits (?!).
Adress bar strings are:
No hits:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=marine&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on
30 hits:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=marine&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&debugQuery=on

Here's the debug output concerning the query:

<str name="rawquerystring">marine</str>
<str name="querystring">marine</str>
<str name="parsedquery">text:marine</str>
<str name="parsedquery_toString">text:marine</str>

Seems fine. This is expected because I already tried the analysis interface to check whether the correct terms are searched for.
Here my schema snippets:

FieldType "text_ws":
<fieldType name="text_ws" class="solr.TextField" positionIncrementGap="100">
<analyzer>
<tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
</analyzer>
</fieldType>
(Solr 1.4.1. default)

Field "text":
<field name="text" type="text_ws" indexed="true" stored="true" termVectors="true" termPositions="true" />

Default search field:
<defaultSearchField>text</defaultSearchField>

I guess this also answers the hints given by Lance. Writing this down, I get the feeling the first thing I should do is to update my index to match the Lucene version used by Solr. This seems to be the most obvious hint (but as Luke can handle all version I thought using this index with Solr should be fine, too). Although it's really quite strange that appending the debug option changes my search results. Oh my, probably I did just miss some basic about how to usr Solr ;) Your opinion? Changing the index to another Lucene version isn't exactly the fastest and easiest thing so I'd like to strike out all other possibilities before :)

Best regards,

    Erik


Am 20.04.2011 01:07, schrieb Lance Norskog:
Look at the "text" definition stack. Does it have the same analyzer
and filter that you used to make the index, and in the same order?

The specific problem is that the "text" field includes a stemmer, and
your code probably did not. And so "marine" is stored as, maybe
'marin'.  To check this out, look at the 'schema browser' page off the
admin page. This will show you all of the indexed terms in each field.
Also look at the Analysis page: this lets you see how text is parsed
and changed in the analysis stack.

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Erick Erickson<erickerick...@gmail.com>  wrote:
Hmmmm, I don't see the problem either. It *sounds* like you don't really
have the default search field defined the way you think you do. Did you restart
Solr after making that change?

I'm assuming that when you say "not created by Solr" you mean that it's created
by Lucene. What version of Lucene and Solr are you using if that's true?

You can test this by appending "&debugQuery=on" to your query or checking
the "debug enable" checkbox in the full query interface from the admin page.
That should show you exactly what is being searched. You might also want
to look at the analysis page for your field and see how your query
is tokenized.

But, like I said, this looks like it should work. If you can post the results of
adding&debugQuery=on and your actual<fieldType>  definition for "text_ws" your
<field>  declaration for "text" and the<defaultSearchField>    from your schema
that would help. I can't tell you how many times something that's eluded me
for hours is obvious to someone else :)..

Best
Erick



On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Erik Fäßler<erik.faess...@uni-jena.de>  wrote:
  Hallo there,

my issue qualifies as newbie question I guess, but I'm really a bit
confused. I have an index which has not been created by Solr. Perhaps that's
already the point although I fail to see why this should be an issue with my
problem.

I use the admin interface to check which results particular queries bring
in. My index documents have a field "text" which holds the document text.
This text has only been white space tokenized. So in my schema, the type for
this field is "text_ws". My schema says
"<defaultSearchField>text</defaultSearchField>".

When I now search for, say, 'marine' (without quotes), I don't get any
search results. But when I search '"marine"' (that is, embraced by double
quotes) I get my document hits. Alternatively, I can prepend the field name:
'text:marine' and will also get my results.

Similar with this phrase query: "marine mussels", where "In marine mussels
of the genus" is a text snippet of a document. The phrase "marine mussels"
won't give any hits. Searching for 'text:"marine mussels"' will give me the
exact document containing this text snippet.

I'm sure this has quite a simple explanation but I'm unable to find it right
now ;-) Perhaps you can help with that.

Thanks a lot!

Best regards,

    Erik

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org






---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to