Thanks Koji, I didn't think it was possible as it stands.
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 21:38 +0900, Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > (11/03/07 1:16), Joel Halbert wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm using FastVectorHighlighter for highlighting, 3.0.3. > > > > At the moment this is highlighting a field which is stored, but not > > compressed. It all works perfectly. > > > > I'd like to compress the field that is being highlighted, but it seems > > like the new way to compress a stored field is to apply it as a separate > > un-indexed stored field to the document, and use > > CompressionToolscompressString manually. > > > > I cann't see how this will play nice with the highlighter though, given > > that I'm highlighting the indexed field. > > > > So, can I use compression on a field I want to highlight? > > Hmm, I've never thought about the combination of FVH and compression. > Current FVH cannot support the store data that is compressed by > client (i.e. compressed other than Field.Store.COMPRESS). > > If FVH supports it, another version of getBestFragment() method > will be needed I think. > > Koji --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
