What is your chosen version? At first glance I'd say your two
examples should be the same but I know there is lots going on behind
the scenes that I don't know about. Is one giving you correct results
and the other not?
As for BooleanFilter - no idea. FWIW I use QueryWrapperFilter,
CachingWrapperFilter and ChainedFilter. Works for me.
--
Ian.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Justin <cry...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Is there a behavioral difference between:
> Query query = new FilteredQuery(query, filter1);
> searcher.search(query, filter2, n);
>
> ...and:
> ChainedFilter filter = new ChainedFilter(
> new Filter[]{filter1, filter2}, ChainedFilter.AND);
> searcher.search(query, filter, n);
>
>
> I chose the former after reading performance measurements here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/FilteringOptions
>
> But I'm definitely getting different results.
>
> I also see that BooleanFilter has been added since our chosen version. Is that
> preferred to the above? Is it worthwhile to update the wiki?
>
> Thanks for any help!
> Justin
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
