Even for IndexWriter.getReader (near real-time)? "changes made during an IndexWriter session can be quickly made available for searching without closing the writer nor calling commit(long)."
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_2/api/all/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexWriter.html#getReader() ----- Original Message ---- From: Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu> To: "java-user@lucene.apache.org" <java-user@lucene.apache.org> Sent: Mon, October 4, 2010 1:05:36 PM Subject: RE: Updating documents with fields that aren't stored This is not a defect: <http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#Does_Lucene_allow_searching_and_indexing_simultaneously.3F>. > -----Original Message----- > From: Justin [mailto:cry...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 2:03 PM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Updating documents with fields that aren't stored > > Hi all, > > The JavaDocs do not appear to mention that only stored fields persist > IndexWriter.updateDocument. When opening new readers, from either > IndexWriter.getReader or IndexReader.open, neither TermDocs nor > IndexSearcher > will find terms in fields which weren't stored. > > Existing readers, however, do continue to find such terms after > updateDocument > has been called. At best, this is confusing. Is this a defect? > > Thanks, > Justin > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
