ok, thanks Yuval. I'll take a look. Could you (or anyone) please elaborate why payloads "seem like a worse fit" ?
TX, Naama On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Yuval Feinstein <yuv...@answers.com>wrote: > Naama, Maybe you could use the new flexible indexing mechanism. > Some information is in this lecture: > > http://lucene-eurocon.org/slides/Lucene-Forecast-Version-Unicode-Flex-and-Mod_Willnauer&Schindler.pdf > Alternatively, you may use payloads, but they seem like a worse fit. > Good Luck, > Yuval > > ________________________________________ > From: Naama Kraus [naamakr...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:38 PM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Overriding Lucene's term weights computation > > Hi, > > Is there a way for an application to index a document along with its "term > weighted vector" (Lucene's TermFreqVector). I.e., override the term > frequencies computed by Lucene, with an application's computed term weights > (non frequency based) ? > I don't think I want to use Scorer#score() for applying score changes as > this one is activated at search time which won't work for me. > > Thanks for any insight, > Naama > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
