Hi Koji, An additional question. Is it possible to access the FieldTermStack from the FastVectorHighlighter after the it has been populated with matching terms from the field?
I think this would provide an ideal solution for this problem, as ultimately I am only concerned with returning positional offsets to have highlighting tags applied to them in a separate process. Thank you for your insight, Steve -----Original Message----- From: Koji Sekiguchi [mailto:k...@r.email.ne.jp] Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 10:42 AM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Term offsets for highlighting Stephen Greene wrote: > Hi Koji, > > Thank you for your reply. I did try the QueryScorer without success, but > I was using Lucene 2.4.x > Hi Steve, I thought you were using 2.9 or later because you mentioned FastVectorHighlighter in your previous mail (FVH was first introduced in 2.9). If I remember it correctly, 2.4's QueryScorer doesn't recognize phrase, but SpanScorer does. > I noticed in the upgrade documentation that some changes had been made > relative to QueryScorer and QueryTermScorer in 3.1. I thought I would > check if someone else had come up with a solution for returning term > offsets before I set out to refactor the existing code. Do you have any > insight as to whether the fast vector highlighter would offer any > benefits in this area over the highlighter package? > > I'm not sure FVH offers benefit for you, but yes, FVH can recognize phrase and highlight terms per phrase. Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
