> previously I was using 2.9 (upgraded from 2.4 but did not fix warnings > etc). Now I have upgraded to 3.0, so I had to fix all deprecated > methods etc. My question is with Version type parameter in some > Token* classes. > > Some of our customers have our product with lucene 2.4 (some upgraded > from 2.3), and some have a newer version with lucene 2.9 (with > warnings etc). What Version value should I use now? The smallest say > Version.LUCENE_23 ? Any concern when they upgrade to the next of our > version with lucene 3.0?
Unless you are relying on quirks in particular versions of lucene setting it to LUCENE_CURRENT is probably best. > Also I was using Field.Index.TOKENIZED and Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED, > but all fields had field.setOmitNorms(true); > Now I see there is Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS, I guess I can > just use Field.Index.ANALYZED/Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED and continue > calling field.setOmitNorms(true) on all fields right? Yes, I think so, but probably best to use ANALYZED_NO_NORMS and NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS. Read the javadocs on NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS. -- Ian. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
