Thanks! Didn't know that it's so easy ;) 2010/1/13 Uwe Schindler <[email protected]>: > Why not simply add the field twice, one time with TokenStream, one time > stored only? Internally stored/indexed fields are handled like that. > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: [email protected] > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Benjamin Heilbrunn [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 2:31 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Field creation with TokenStream and stored value >> >> Sorry for pushing this thing. >> >> Would it be possible to add the demanded constructor or would it break >> anything of lucenes logic? >> >> >> 2010/1/11 Benjamin Heilbrunn <[email protected]>: >> > Hey out there, >> > >> > in lucene it's not possible to create a Field based on a TokenStream >> > AND supply a stored value. >> > >> > Is there a reason why a Field constructor in the form of >> > public Field(String name, TokenStream tokenStream, String >> storedValue) >> > does not exist? >> > >> > I am using trees of TeeSinkTokenFilter's for the creation of many >> > fields, based on a source string. >> > That's the reason why I can't use the "standardconstructor" >> > public Field(String name, String value, Store store, Index index) >> > >> > >> > Regards >> > Benjamin >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
