No other exceptions I could spot.
OS: win2003 32bits, with NTFS. This is a vm running on vmware fusion on a mac.
jvm: I made sure, java version "1.6.0_14"
IndexWriter settings:
writer.setMaxFieldLength(maxFieldLength);
writer.setMergeFactor(10);
writer.setRAMBufferSizeMB(10);
writer.setUseCompoundFile(true);
writer.setTermIndexInterval(512);
In this production environment only a single thread was indexing. No
addIndexes() is used. In some ocassions yes write.lock might be
deleted by code.
I have added infoStream to stdout in my code so in the future we would
run this with debug on.
javier
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Michael McCandless
<luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> Any Lucene-related exceptions hit in your env? What OS (looks like
> Windows, but which one?), filesystem are you on?
>
> And are you really certain about the java version being used in your
> production env? Don't just trust which java your interactive shell
> finds on its PATH -- double check how your app server is actually
> launched.
>
> Have you changed any of IndexWriter's defaults? Are you adding docs
> with many threads? Using addIndexes? Do you ever forcefully remove
> the write.lock, or use Lucene's API to unlock the index? The more
> info you can give about how your app uses Lucene, the better.
>
> And if possible run with infoStream enabled so we can maybe capture
> the corruption happening.
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 7:09 AM, jm <jmugur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I manually did CheckIndex in all indexes and found two with issues:
>>
>> first
>> Segments file=segments_42w numSegments=21 version=FORMAT_HAS_PROX [Lucene
>> 2.4]
>> 1 of 21: name=_109 docCount=10410
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=55,789
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [170764 terms; 6214606 terms/docs
>> pairs; 29694242 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [10410 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 2 of 21: name=_160 docCount=2178
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=11,676
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [92275 terms; 1264593 terms/docs
>> pairs; 5807908 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [2178 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 3 of 21: name=_1i9 docCount=2225
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=10,872
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [92284 terms; 1193562 terms/docs
>> pairs; 5253891 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [2225 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 4 of 21: name=_1qx docCount=2654
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=14,374
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [95153 terms; 1623058 terms/docs
>> pairs; 7151784 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [2654 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 5 of 21: name=_248 docCount=2165
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=11,446
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [92177 terms; 1243801 terms/docs
>> pairs; 5632974 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [2165 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 6 of 21: name=_2a4 docCount=2508
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=13,917
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [94222 terms; 1566966 terms/docs
>> pairs; 6967989 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [2508 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 7 of 21: name=_2pu docCount=2092
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=10,217
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [91592 terms; 1105091 terms/docs
>> pairs; 4865932 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [2092 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 8 of 21: name=_35q docCount=3285
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=16,378
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...ERROR [term
>> attachments:c7a0e2a47ebad4214e933621f6c9dac7: doc 426 <= lastDoc 426]
>> java.lang.RuntimeException: term
>> attachments:c7a0e2a47ebad4214e933621f6c9dac7: doc 426 <= lastDoc 426
>> at
>> org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex.testTermIndex(CheckIndex.java:644)
>> at org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex.checkIndex(CheckIndex.java:530)
>> at org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex.checkIndex(CheckIndex.java:319)
>> at org.getopt.luke.Luke$6.run(Unknown Source)
>> test: stored fields.......OK [3285 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>> FAILED
>> WARNING: fixIndex() would remove reference to this segment; full
>> exception:
>> java.lang.RuntimeException: Term Index test failed
>> at org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex.checkIndex(CheckIndex.java:543)
>> at org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex.checkIndex(CheckIndex.java:319)
>> at org.getopt.luke.Luke$6.run(Unknown Source)
>>
>> 9 of 21: name=_3g7 docCount=2016
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=11,813
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [91094 terms; 1286115 terms/docs
>> pairs; 5942307 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [2016 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 10 of 21: name=_3o8 docCount=1702
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=10,008
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [89179 terms; 1081620 terms/docs
>> pairs; 4960310 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [1702 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 11 of 21: name=_3wq docCount=2249
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=13,441
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [92829 terms; 1491635 terms/docs
>> pairs; 6851263 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [2249 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 12 of 21: name=_3zd docCount=2264
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=14,153
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [92747 terms; 1602790 terms/docs
>> pairs; 7248272 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [2264 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 13 of 21: name=_44r docCount=2743
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=16,56
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [95135 terms; 1817602 terms/docs
>> pairs; 8534778 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [2743 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 14 of 21: name=_4fl docCount=2105
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=13,041
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [91940 terms; 1447522 terms/docs
>> pairs; 6565862 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [2105 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 15 of 21: name=_4gf docCount=1891
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=10,88
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [90339 terms; 1186203 terms/docs
>> pairs; 5392055 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [1891 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 16 of 21: name=_54z docCount=2007
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=10,848
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [91154 terms; 1199551 terms/docs
>> pairs; 5284819 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [2007 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 17 of 21: name=_5ao docCount=530
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=3,743
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [76964 terms; 311259 terms/docs
>> pairs; 1569162 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [530 total field count; avg 1 fields per doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 18 of 21: name=_5am docCount=113
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=2,118
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [66266 terms; 142915 terms/docs
>> pairs; 711223 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [113 total field count; avg 1 fields per doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 19 of 21: name=_5ap docCount=117
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=0,525
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [15930 terms; 50518 terms/docs pairs;
>> 203306 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [117 total field count; avg 1 fields per doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 20 of 21: name=_5ar docCount=165
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=0,73
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [22756 terms; 67573 terms/docs pairs;
>> 273697 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [165 total field count; avg 1 fields per doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 21 of 21: name=_5at docCount=115
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=0,409
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [14805 terms; 40657 terms/docs pairs;
>> 139527 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [115 total field count; avg 1 fields per doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> WARNING: 1 broken segments (containing 3285 documents) detected
>>
>>
>> ===============================================================================================
>> second:
>>
>> Segments file=segments_7s4 numSegments=12 version=FORMAT_HAS_PROX [Lucene
>> 2.4]
>> 1 of 12: name=_3hm docCount=17119
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=88,715
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...ERROR [term body:mas: doc 13174 <= lastDoc
>> 13174]
>> java.lang.RuntimeException: term body:mas: doc 13174 <= lastDoc 13174
>> at
>> org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex.testTermIndex(CheckIndex.java:644)
>> at org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex.checkIndex(CheckIndex.java:530)
>> at org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex.checkIndex(CheckIndex.java:319)
>> at org.getopt.luke.Luke$6.run(Unknown Source)
>> test: stored fields.......OK [17119 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>> FAILED
>> WARNING: fixIndex() would remove reference to this segment; full
>> exception:
>> java.lang.RuntimeException: Term Index test failed
>> at org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex.checkIndex(CheckIndex.java:543)
>> at org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex.checkIndex(CheckIndex.java:319)
>> at org.getopt.luke.Luke$6.run(Unknown Source)
>>
>> 2 of 12: name=_4bl docCount=3302
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=19,256
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [98534 terms; 2136125 terms/docs
>> pairs; 9970629 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [3302 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 3 of 12: name=_4w9 docCount=4380
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=27,348
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [103306 terms; 3081204 terms/docs
>> pairs; 14235295 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [4380 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 4 of 12: name=_5jh docCount=4372
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=28,867
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [103363 terms; 3187068 terms/docs
>> pairs; 15176139 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [4372 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 5 of 12: name=_6nn docCount=6526
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=32,316
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [111787 terms; 3720002 terms/docs
>> pairs; 16710886 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [6526 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 6 of 12: name=_82m docCount=6889
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=36,753
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [113120 terms; 4284180 terms/docs
>> pairs; 19188993 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [6889 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 7 of 12: name=_8kv docCount=2286
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=13,367
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [93101 terms; 1437797 terms/docs
>> pairs; 6844358 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [2286 total field count; avg 1 fields per
>> doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 8 of 12: name=_8i0 docCount=141
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=1,618
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [63287 terms; 85330 terms/docs pairs;
>> 414225 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [141 total field count; avg 1 fields per doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 9 of 12: name=_8kt docCount=275
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=2,549
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [73391 terms; 173116 terms/docs
>> pairs; 847099 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [275 total field count; avg 1 fields per doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 10 of 12: name=_8n3 docCount=103
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=0,618
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [18925 terms; 50696 terms/docs pairs;
>> 248460 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [103 total field count; avg 1 fields per doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 11 of 12: name=_8n4 docCount=3
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=1,209
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [49084 terms; 49234 terms/docs pairs;
>> 267700 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [3 total field count; avg 1 fields per doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> 12 of 12: name=_8n5 docCount=122
>> compound=true
>> hasProx=true
>> numFiles=1
>> size (MB)=0,66
>> no deletions
>> test: open reader.........OK
>> test: fields..............OK [6 fields]
>> test: field norms.........OK [6 fields]
>> test: terms, freq, prox...OK [20211 terms; 54518 terms/docs pairs;
>> 267390 tokens]
>> test: stored fields.......OK [122 total field count; avg 1 fields per doc]
>> test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0
>> term/freq vector fields per doc]
>>
>> WARNING: 1 broken segments (containing 17119 documents) detected
>>
>>
>> I have not been able to reproduce this in my env.
>>
>> javier
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:23 PM, jm <jmugur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Ok, I got the index from the production machine, but I am having some
>>> problem to find the index..., our process deals with multiple indexes,
>>> in the current exception I cannot see any indication about the index
>>> having the issue. I opened all my indexes with luke and old opened
>>> succesfully, some had around 4000 docs (so I can discard those I
>>> think), and some had around 40.000 docs, I was hoping one that had
>>> around 24658 docs, but I guess this is the number of docs in one
>>> segment, not the whole index right?
>>>
>>> Any idea to help find the index?
>>>
>>> In the codebase it would be nice to give any hint about the index
>>> (path in case of a fsdirectory etc) when found an exception, dont
>>> assume there is a single index in the application.
>>>
>>> javier
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Michael McCandless
>>> <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>> Also, if you're able to reproduce this, can you call
>>>> writer.setInfoStream and capture & post the resulting output leading
>>>> up to the exception?
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 7:12 AM, jm <jmugur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> The process is still running and ops dont want to stop it. As soon as
>>>>> stops I'll try checkindex.
>>>>>
>>>>> Its created brand new with 2.4.1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Michael McCandless
>>>>> <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I think you're using a JRE that has the fix for the issue found in
>>>>>> LUCENE-1282.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you run CheckIndex on your index and post the output?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Was this index created from scratch on Lucene 2.4.1? Or, created from
>>>>>> an earlier Lucene version?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 6:03 AM, jm <jmugur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> or are we really? I think we are on 1.6 update 14 right??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sorry Im lost right now on jdk version numbering
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:01 PM, jm <jmugur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> on second thought...I hadnt noticed the jdk numbers properly, we are
>>>>>>>> using using b28, and JDK 6 Update 10 (b28) is the one fixing this...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ok forget this then
>>>>>>>> thanks!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 11:55 AM, jm <jmugur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dont know if this should be here or in java-dev, posting to this one
>>>>>>>>> first. In one of our installations, we have encountered an exception:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "Lucene Merge Thread #0"
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.MergePolicy$MergeException:
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.CorruptIndexException: docs out of order
>>>>>>>>> (24658 <= 24658 )
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.ConcurrentMergeScheduler.handleMergeException(ConcurrentMergeScheduler.java:309)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.ConcurrentMergeScheduler$MergeThread.run(ConcurrentMergeScheduler.java:286)
>>>>>>>>> Caused by: org.apache.lucene.index.CorruptIndexException: docs out of
>>>>>>>>> order (24658 <= 24658 )
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentMerger.appendPostings(SegmentMerger.java:641)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentMerger.mergeTermInfo(SegmentMerger.java:586)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentMerger.mergeTermInfos(SegmentMerger.java:547)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentMerger.mergeTerms(SegmentMerger.java:500)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentMerger.merge(SegmentMerger.java:140)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.mergeMiddle(IndexWriter.java:4231)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.merge(IndexWriter.java:3884)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.ConcurrentMergeScheduler.doMerge(ConcurrentMergeScheduler.java:205)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.ConcurrentMergeScheduler$MergeThread.run(ConcurrentMergeScheduler.java:260)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have investigated in the list and it looked like
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1282. But we are using
>>>>>>>>> 2.4.1, and
>>>>>>>>> C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>java -version
>>>>>>>>> java version "1.6.0_14"
>>>>>>>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_14-b08)
>>>>>>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> java process launched like this:
>>>>>>>>> java -server -Xmx1536m ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So I understand this bug should not be happening??
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> any idea?
>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>> javi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
