Phew :) Thanks for bringing closure! Mike
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > If in fact you are using CFS (it is the default), and your OS is > letting you use 10240 descriptors, and you haven't changed the > mergeFactor, then something is seriously wrong. I would triple check > that all readers are being closed. > > Or... if you list the index directory, how many files do you see? > > Mike > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Istvan Soos <istvan.s...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Michael McCandless >> <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: >>> Are you sure you're closing all readers that you're opening? >> >> Absolutely. :) (okay, never say this, but I had bugz because of this >> previously so I'm pretty sure that one is ok). >> >>> It's surprising with normal usage of Lucene that you'd run out of >>> descriptors, with its default mergeFactor (have you increased the >>> mergeFactor)? >> >> Default merge factor. (on Mac, the default maxfiles is 256, however >> I've run out of descriptors event at 10240, if I hadn't called >> optimize). >> >>> You can also enable compound file, which uses far fewer file >>> descriptors, at some cost to indexing performance. >> >> I thought this is the default but I'll check... >> >>> Also, a partial optimize (ie optimize(N)) does less IO but still >>> substantially reduces segment count of the index. >> >> I wasn't aware of this, thanks, I'll try it! >> >> Regards, >> Istvan >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
