On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> wrote: > It may be surprising, but in fact I have read that > javadoc.
It was not your email I responded to. > It talks about not needing to close the > writer, but doesn't specifically talk about the what > the relationship between commit() calls and > getReader() calls is. Do you have a suggestion of how to update the JavaDoc? I'm not sure I understand the relationship between commit and getReader that you refer to. > , but why > is it so obvious that what could be happening > is that it only "returns all changes since the last > commit, but without touching disk because it > has docs in memory as well"? Sorry, this seems confusing - I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Perhaps we should approach this as proposed javadoc changes? -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
