Hey Simon, Thanks for the comment, though would be great to have the comment @ the blog! :) About testing vanilla sphinx Vs Sphinx, have that pipelined but would be some time before I go ahead and do that. I'm also planning a benchmarking (of search & indexing) of 2.4 & 2.9 (when its here) with the most recent version of sphinx (and other search engines).
-- Anshum Gupta Naukri Labs! http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The distinction is yours to draw............ On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Simon Willnauer < simon.willna...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Anshum, thanks for posting this on the list. I have a view comments on > that benchmark while being happy that lucene has an upper hand in > yours. > I wonder if you can publish the various modifications you did to > either of those? If not would it be possible to run the benchmarks > against the vanilla versions? Did you use an already released version > of lucene or did you do modifications against the trunk? I found it > little hard to read - putting it into a table would make little more > sense to me though. I personally would be interested in what kind of > analysis you have applied to the index document and the queries > though. > > simon > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Anshum<ansh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I just happened to benchmark a little modified version of lucene with a > > little modified version of sphinx :) > > Have posted my results here > > http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com > > Would also be updating more @ the blog in a while! > > > > -- > > Anshum Gupta > > Naukri Labs! > > http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com > > > > The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The > > distinction is yours to draw............ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
