Mike's instrumented version is not printing anything on this query and it works fine with trunk version
BS2 gets executed (top Query Required... +((( )))? again the Query: Query: +(((NAME:maria NAME:marae^0.25171682 NAME:marai^0.2365632 NAME:marao^0.2365632 NAME:marau^0.2365632 NAME:marea^0.2834352 NAME:marei^0.25171682 NAME:mareo^0.25171682 NAME:mareu^0.25171682 NAME:marie^0.28577283 NAME:marieh^0.2451648 NAME:mariha^0.2583552 NAME:mariu^0.27189124 NAME:marja^0.2834352 NAME:marje^0.2673408 NAME:marji^0.25171682 NAME:marjo^0.25171682 NAME:marju^0.25171682 NAME:marla^0.2673408 NAME:marle^0.25171682 NAME:marli^0.2365632 NAME:marlo^0.2365632 NAME:maroa^0.2673408 NAME:maroe^0.25171682 NAME:maroi^0.2365632 NAME:marou^0.2365632 NAME:marua^0.2673408 NAME:marue^0.25171682 NAME:marui^0.2365632 NAME:maruo^0.2365632 NAME:marye^0.2673408 NAME:maryi^0.25171682 NAME:maryo^0.25171682 NAME:meria^0.2787888 NAME:miria^0.25835523 NAME:moria^0.25835523 NAME:muria^0.25835523 NAME:naria^0.27648002 NAME:narie^0.25392002 NAME:neria^0.25392002) (NAME:piekarski NAME:bekarski^0.19200002 NAME:beugarski^0.20281483 NAME:blacharski^0.19200002 NAME:lekarski^0.19200002 NAME:pecarski^0.21294187 NAME:peikarski^0.27648002 NAME:pekarska^0.20172001 NAME:pekarski^0.22446752 NAME:pekarskj^0.21294187 NAME:pekarsky^0.21294187 NAME:pickarske^0.21168004 NAME:pickarski^0.22073482 NAME:piekalski^0.23941332 NAME:piekanski^0.23941332 NAME:piekaraka^0.22533335 NAME:piekarsci^0.29205337 NAME:piekarska^0.28421336 NAME:piekarskie^0.25392002 NAME:piekarsky^0.29205337 NAME:piekarzcyk^0.23232001 NAME:piekarzki^0.29205337 NAME:piekaski^0.24843001 NAME:piekavska^0.22533335 NAME:piekorski^0.28421336 NAME:pielarski^0.22997928 NAME:pierarski^0.22997928 NAME:pierkarski^0.24661335 NAME:piesarski^0.22997928 NAME:pietarski^0.22997928 NAME:pietkarski^0.24661335 NAME:pikarski^0.23232001 NAME:piowarski^0.20281483 NAME:pirkarski^0.22073482 NAME:plocharski^0.21168004 NAME:pokarski^0.20172001 NAME:polikarski^0.20172001 NAME:pukarski^0.20172001 NAME:pyekarska^0.26508 NAME:siekarski^0.20281483))^2.0) ----- Original Message ---- > From: eks dev <eks...@yahoo.co.uk> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org; yo...@lucidimagination.com > Sent: Wednesday, 15 July, 2009 23:57:22 > Subject: Re: speed of BooleanQueries on 2.9 > > > > it works with current trunk, 10 Minutes ago built?! > > if I put lucene from yesterday, the same symptoms like yesterday... > > Mike's instrumented version is running ... > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Yonik Seeley > > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > > Sent: Wednesday, 15 July, 2009 23:34:29 > > Subject: Re: speed of BooleanQueries on 2.9 > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Uwe Schindlerwrote: > > > And the fix only affects custom DocIdSetIterators. > > > > And custom Queries (via Scorer) since Scorer inherits from DISI. > > But as Mike says, it shouldn't be the issue behind in this thread. > > > > -Yonik > > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
