On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> Have you tried out, if GC affects you? A first step would be to turn on GC > logging with -verbosegc -XX:+PrintGCDetails > > If you see some relation between query time and gc messages, you should try > to use a better parallelized GC and change the perm size and so on (se docs > about GC tuning). I'll definitely try this, and thank you for the GC options details that you posted previously. I have a test server that's exactly the same configuration as our production boxes, which I need to use to try this out (with the same indexes of course). It's busy doing some unrelated work at the moment but next week I should be able to do some tests. Thanks, Chris
