LUCENE-1313 is just an enhancement to near real-time search that won't make it into 2.9 at this point (we are "gunning" to get 2.9 out the door...).
Ie, near real-time search was already committed to trunk, under LUCENE-1516. Mike On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:08 AM, João Silva<galaio.si...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks mike, i will see that. > The ticket for that functionallity is the Lucene-1313? > > Thanks, > João > > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> Have you tried the patch on LUCENE-1026? It's rather standalone from >> Lucene's core -- it adds a convenience layer (for interleaving >> reads/writes) on a single index. >> >> Or, code it up yourself. As of 2.9 (not yet released -- available on >> trunk now), near real-time search makes this particularly simple. >> You'd keep a writer open indefinitely, to do deletes/adds, then call >> writer.getReader() to get a new IndexReader that sees all changes done >> against that writer. You can then separately call writer.commit() to >> make all changes permanent (written to stable storage) in the index, >> as your app requires. >> >> Multiple users making changes should be simple, since IndexWriter is >> thread safe.. >> >> Mike >> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:10 AM, João Silva<galaio.si...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I mike, thanks. >> > >> > I rewrite my problem: >> > >> > I trying to implement a web tool for uploading documents, >> > for now i'm implementing basic operations, to upload the >> > and retrieve the users files, so it can read and/or >> > modify/delete them. >> > Imagine tha i have several users performing that operations, >> > is there any implementation(pool,threading, etc) in lucene >> > to perform that kindo of operations. >> > >> > I already seen the Lucene-1026 that initially implemented some >> > kind of that functionality, but it was abandoned. >> > >> > Is there any following implementations of that ticket? >> > >> > Its a single jvm and tool will work in a webserver. >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > joão >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Michael McCandless < >> > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: >> > >> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Simon >> >> Willnauer<simon.willna...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Mike I guess you mean a single VM (JRE rather refers to a version or >> >> > vendor) - Just wanna clarify. >> >> >> >> Right, I meant a "single java process", so I guess an instance of a JVM? >> >> >> >> Within that instance, many threads can be doing writing against an >> index. >> >> >> >> Mike >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Cumprimentos, >> > João Carlos Galaio da Silva >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > Cumprimentos, > João Carlos Galaio da Silva > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
