Hi,
That method needs to be deprecated. Please use findWithIndex() instead. I
will deprecate that method in the next release. Also, I will enable line
numbers in it.
Anmol
Michael Mastroianni wrote:
>
> Hi-- Using the 1.0.7 jar file, I am having problems with occasional
> ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExceptions and StackOverFlowErrors when trying to
> do a find in a P4DocIdSet. Here is a unit test that I can reliably get
> to generate a StackOverFlowError. Have you seen this before? Since I'm
> using the jar file, I can't really do much debugging of this one.
>
> regards,
> Michael
>
>
> public void testForOutOfBounds()
> {
> Random rand = new Random(System.currentTimeMillis());
> int maxDoc = 350000;
> ArrayList<Integer> nums = new ArrayList<Integer>();
> HashSet<Integer> seen = new HashSet<Integer>();
> for(int i=0; i < 68; ++i)
> {
> int nextDoc = rand.nextInt(maxDoc);
> if(seen.contains(nextDoc))
> {
> while(seen.contains(nextDoc))
> {
> nextDoc = rand.nextInt(maxDoc);
> }
> }
> nums.add(nextDoc);
> seen.add(nextDoc);
> }
> Collections.sort(nums);
> DocSet docs = new P4DDocIdSet();
> for (Integer integer : nums)
> {
> docs.addDoc(integer);
> }
> boolean got = docs.find(403);
> }
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: molz [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:58 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: kamikaze
>
>
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> 2 Questions.
>
> 1. What version of Kamikaze are you running with?
> 2. Can you try the snippet below and let me know if it fails ? I ran it
> 20
> times and it did not fail. Maybe there is some difference in the
> utitlity
> methods you have ? I am still trying to track down if anything is off at
> my
> end but does not seem to be.
>
> public void testMultipleIntersections()
> {
> ArrayList<OpenBitSet> obs = new ArrayList<OpenBitSet>();
> ArrayList<DocIdSet> docs = new ArrayList<DocIdSet>();
> Random rand = new Random(System.currentTimeMillis());
> int maxDoc = 350000;
> for(int i=0; i < 3; ++i)
> {
> int numdocs = rand.nextInt(maxDoc);
> ArrayList<Integer> nums = new
> ArrayList<Integer>();
> HashSet<Integer> seen = new HashSet<Integer>();
> for (int j = 0; j < numdocs; j++)
> {
> int nextDoc = rand.nextInt(maxDoc);
> if(seen.contains(nextDoc))
> {
> while(seen.contains(nextDoc))
> {
> nextDoc =
> rand.nextInt(maxDoc);
> }
> }
> nums.add(nextDoc);
> seen.add(nextDoc);
> }
> Collections.sort(nums);
> obs.add(createObs(nums, maxDoc));
> docs.add(createDocSet(nums));
> }
> OpenBitSet base = obs.get(0);
> for(int i = 1; i < obs.size(); ++i)
> {
> base.intersect(obs.get(i));
> }
>
> AndDocIdSet ands = new AndDocIdSet(docs);
> long card1 = base.cardinality();
> long card2 = ands.size();
> System.out.println(card1+":"+card2);
> assertEquals(card1, card2);
> }
>
>
> private OpenBitSet createObs(ArrayList<Integer> nums, int maxDoc) {
> OpenBitSet bitSet = new OpenBitSet(maxDoc);
> for(int num:nums)
> bitSet.set(num);
> return bitSet;
> }
>
> private DocIdSet createDocSet(ArrayList<Integer> nums) {
> DocSet p4d = DocSetFactory.getDocSetInstance(0, 35000000, 200000,
> DocSetFactory.FOCUS.OPTIMAL);
> for(int num:nums)
> p4d.addDoc(num);
> return p4d;
> }
>
> I even tried with the following
>
> private DocIdSet createDocSet(ArrayList<Integer> nums) {
> P4DDocIdSet p4d = new P4DDocIdSet();
> for(int num:nums)
> p4d.addDoc(num);
> return p4d;
> }
>
>
> The NPE you mention in the previous emails has been identified as a bug
> and
> will be fixed in the next release (in a day or two).
>
> Thanks,
> Anmol
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/kamikaze-tp23224760p23307098.html
> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
> This e-mail message, and any attachments, is intended only for the use of
> the individual or entity identified in the alias address of this message
> and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and subject
> to legal restrictions and penalties regarding its unauthorized disclosure
> and use. Any unauthorized review, copying, disclosure, use or distribution
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error,
> please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this
> message, and any attachments, from your system. Thank you.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/kamikaze-tp23224760p23322582.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
