Adrian Dimulescu wrote:
Thank you.
I suppose the solution for this is to not create an index but to store
co-occurence frequencies at Analyzer level.
I don't understand how this would address the "docFreq does
not reflect deletions".
You can use the shingles analyzer (under contrib/analyzers)
to create and index bigrams. (But the docFreq would still not
reflect deletions).
Adrian.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
Be careful: docFreq does not take deletions into account.
Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
