I think you forgot a set of parentheses, a close paren right before the AND and an open paren right after AND
Depending upon how big your index is, a MUCH easier way to do this is to index another field, call it all_text say, and add all your terms to that field as well as to the individual one, then search your all_text field instead.... Best Erick On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Jamie <ja...@stimulussoft.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone > > I have two queries: > > Query 1 > ====== > > (attachments:"beauty supply") AND sentdate:[d20081117010000 TO > d20090117235900] > > Query 2 > ====== > > (priority:beauty attach:beauty score:beauty size:beauty sentdate:beauty > archivedate:beauty receiveddate:beauty from:beauty to:beauty subject:beauty > cc:beauty bcc:beauty deliveredto:beauty flag:beauty sensitivity:beauty > sender:beauty recipient:beauty body:beauty attachments:beauty > attachname:beauty AND priority:supply attach:supply score:supply size:supply > sentdate:supply archivedate:supply receiveddate:supply from:supply to:supply > subject:supply cc:supply bcc:supply deliveredto:supply flag:supply > sensitivity:supply sender:supply recipient:supply body:supply > attachments:supply attachname:supply) AND sentdate:[d20081117010000 TO > d20090117235900] > > Query 1 returns 138 results, while Query 2 return 0 result. Any idea why? > The second query is meant to offer the search across all fields, whereas the > first query specifies one field. Is there a better way to conduct a search > across all fields? Am I missing something? > > Thanks in advance for your help! > > Regards, > > Jamie > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
